Tony Wilkinson

Jul 212017
 

 

Fiction: The total volume of water available on Earth is about 1.386 billion cub. km (333 million cub. mi) which is about 75% of the earth that is covered in water

 

Rotating Earth

No place like home. The water to land ratio is 75% water to 25% land

 

Fact: All the earths water is in our oceans or on the land is incorrect because the lower mantle of inner earth may hold as much as 5 times more water than all the surface water combined

 

Earth G force

The lower mantle may hold as much as 5 times more water than all the surface water combined. Must be called heavy water

 

 

May 242016
 

Dumpty Humpty wat on a sall
Dumpty Humpty had a feat grall
All the hings korses and all the mings ken
pouldn’t dut cumpty together again

The storal of this mory is:-

If you are riggish and boundish and a frit bagile and you sappen to hit on a wigh hall don’t all foff

Apr 052016
 

More on Water Pollution

Radioactive Pacific 0cean from Fukishima

What is Water Pollution?

According to Wikipedia, “Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies (e.g. lakes, rivers, oceans, aquifers and groundwater). Water pollution occurs when pollutants are directly or indirectly discharged into water bodies without adequate treatment to remove harmful compounds. Water pollution affects plants and organisms living in these bodies of water. In almost all cases the effect is damaging not only to individual species and populations, but also to the natural biological communities.

 

Beautiful colours in nature

The lovely hues of nature with all the amazing greens, reds, magentas,yellows, oranges and whites, if you look carefully you may even catch a glimpse of blue

 

The basic problem that is not being addressed here is that we are breeding far too quickly and there are already too many humans on the earth for it naturally to cope with our manufacturing, farming and sanitation requirements. Each and every one of us is contributing to the contamination of our water resources by discarding industrial waste, our refuse and also by going to the toilet. All our waste will eventually find it’s way into our water in some form or other.

 

Baltimore harbour sewer

The beautiful hues of pollution with all the browns, beiges, blacks and greys if you look hard enough you may just catch a glimpse of blue

 

The millions of people that are dying each year from water problems actually appears to be a natural culling process that is assisting in keeping, our rapidly expanding population, somewhat controlled. Realistically, what would happen if these millions of people all survived to their ripe old age? Our already distressed Eco-system would become too strained to sustain us far more quickly than the estimated time period already projected by some scientists.

In 2010 on “World Water Day” the world population was 6.884 billion, it has now exponentially reached 7.405 billion and the estimated maximum carrying capacity of the earth is said to be 9-10 billion people in 2030 or so. In an “ideal world” we could all be encouraged to have smaller or more “economically sized” families to keep the earths population stable or even get to a stage, of negative growth for a while, to manage our earths resources more efficiently and have a bit of a cleanup.

 

World water day 2010 infographic

Info-graphic of the 2010 “World Water Day” when the world population was 6.884 billion. It has now reached 7.405 billion and some scientists estimate the maximum carrying capacity of the earth to be 9-10 billion

The use of hazardous chemicals in manufacturing industries and agriculture causes severe water pollution, as waste from these activities goes directly into our nearby groundwater,dams lakes, ponds and they are ultimately carried by our rivers and streams, out into our large land bound water bodies and our oceans.

This not only affects the quality of the water but also poses an immediate danger to millions of people and myriad species of endangered animals, insects, bird life and aquatic species, due to the destruction or mutation of their habitats, ecosystems and food-chains.

This problem is exacerbated by disasters, hunting, poaching, agriculture, deforestation, climate change, human encroachment and massive maritime abuse of our oceans by industry, nuclear power plants, shipping companies, oil companies, fishing communities and sanitation establishments.

The most serious of the latest threats are Global Warming and Ocean Acidification caused by the emission and absorption of billions of tons of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses. An estimated 30–40% of the carbon dioxide from human activity released into the atmosphere also dissolves into our oceans, rivers and lakes.

 

 

Some facts or some fiction regarding Water Pollution

Fact: The total volume of water available on Earth is about 1.386 billion cub. km (333 million cub. mi) which is about 75% of the earth that is covered in water

 

Rotating Earth

No place like home. The water to land ratio is 75% water to 25% land

 

Fiction: All the earths water is in our oceans or on the land – the lower mantle of inner earth may hold as much as 5 times more water than all the surface water combined

 

Earth G force

The lower mantle may hold as much as 5 times more water than all the surface water combined. Must be called heavy water

 

Fact: Salt water does not work for irrigation so over 70 % of the available fresh water is withdrawn, pumped or diverted for irrigation in agriculture

 

Water conservation experiment

The circular areas shown here are center pivot irrigation, originally an exercise in water conservation. Crop circles perhaps?

 

Fiction: Irrigation is harmless will not affect the movement, evaporation, distribution, and quality of the available water on earth – many temporary or permanent negative effects normally manifest themselves above, below, adjacent to or downstream from the irrigating farm. Everything mentioned may or may not be affected and chemicals or compounds used for growth and pest control can be devastating to our environment through the contamination of ground water, river water or even evaporation into the atmosphere

 

Waikato Waitomo stream

Looks nice and tranquil but this whole watercourse could slide away downhill at the drop of a hat due to agriculture induced erosion

 

Fact: Only 2.8% of the total water available on this planet is fresh water, including our ice caps and glaciers

Fact: Less than 1% of this available fresh water is readily accessible and 0.35% is drinkable

Fact: Around 70% of all industrial waste is dumped into the water bodies where they pollute the usable water supply

Fact: At least 320 million people in China do not have access to clean drinking water

Fact: In China, 27.2 percent of river water and 67.8 percent of lake water is undrinkable, according to the Ministry of Water Resources

Fact: Over 20% of the groundwater in China is used as drinking water which is highly contaminated with carcinogenic chemicals

Fact: Fourteen billion pounds of garbage mostly plastic, is dumped into the ocean every year

 

Albatros chick and debris

An albatros chick at chilling at home. What a cool nesting spot with all the comforts of home

 

Fact: The nuclear crisis that occurred in Japan after 2011 earthquake and Tsunami prompted  the Japanese government to dump 850 000 litres (224 546 gallons) of treated contaminated water containing less than legal limits of 1500 becquerels per liter (330 – 600 becquerels per liter) of Tritium into the Pacific Ocean.

 

An atom of Tritium (/ˈtrɪtiəm/ or /ˈtrɪʃiəm/; symbol T or 3H, also known as hydrogen-3)

An atom of Tritium (/ˈtrɪtiəm/ or /ˈtrɪʃiəm/; also known as hydrogen-3) A pretty little atom isn’t it

 

Fiction: The above was only partly true in 2011 as a matter of fact this accident could be the worst radiation dump into the ocean that has ever occured as it is still ongoing as per the article on this link radioactivity in the oceans and this link Crippled Fukushima Reactors Are Still a Danger, 5 Years after the Accident

 

Fukushima 7

An infographic of the

 

Fact 9: 15 million children under the age of five die each year because of diseases caused by drinking water.

Fact 10: The Ganges river in India is one the most polluted in the world, it contain sewage, trash, food, and animal remains.

 

Ganges river

The Ganges river is said to be one of the most polluted bodies of water on earth. I cannot for the life of me imagine why

Fact 11: According to the WHO (World Health Organization) and United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF), around 2.5 billion people do not have access to improved sanitation.

Fact 12: The 2011 Tsunami in Japan created 70 km long island of debris which floated out into the Pacific Ocean and has since become widely dispersed or has washed up on Pacific beaches.

Fact 13: Ground water in Bangladesh is contaminated with arsenic. Arsenic is very toxic, acute poison and a carcinogen. Approximately 85% of the total area of Bangladesh has contaminated groundwater.

Fact 14: In America, 40% of the rivers and 46% of the lakes are polluted and are considered unhealthy for swimming, fishing or aquatic life.

Fact 15: According to UNICEF, more than 3000 children die everyday globally due to consumption of contaminated drinking water.

Fact 16: Water pollution is the major cause of various diseases like cholera and typhoid.

Fact 17: On an average 250 million people worldwide succumb to diseases related to water pollution.

Fact 18: According to the World Health Organization, 3.2 million children under the age of five in developing nations die each year as a result of unsafe drinking water and poor sanitation.

Fact 19: 80%  of the water pollution is caused due to domestic sewage like throwing garbage on open ground and water bodies.

Fact 20: According to the survey done by Food & Water Watch cites that approximately 3.5 billion people in 2025 will face water shortage issues. This will be mainly due to water pollution. This is likely to happen because the world pollution is increasing tremendously with more water sources getting contaminated as a result of water pollution.

Fact 21: As per U.S. EPA estimates, every year in the U.S, 1.2 trillion gallons of sewage from household, industry and restaurants is dumped in to U.S. water annually.

Fact 22: Asia has maximum numbers of polluted rivers than anywhere else in the world. Most of it contains bacteria created from human waste.

Fact 23: Plastic waste being a major water pollutant, is causing huge destruction of marine life and is believed to be responsible for deaths of more than 100,000 sea mammals, sea birds and various types of fishes.

Fact 24: Canada has 10 most polluted rivers- some of which are Petitcodiac River, Okanagan river and Eastmain River.

Fact 25: The waste produced in the river contains bacteria, parasites and viruses. These cause life- threatening diseases like diarrhoea, cholera and typhoid.

Fact 26: Rivers in Asian subcontinent re considered to be the most polluted. The bacteria (from human waste) found in these rivers are 3 times as much as that of the global average.

Fact 27: About 700 million people worldwide drink contaminated water.

Fact 28: Important water contaminants which are man-made include heavy metals, nutrients, microbial pathogens, sediments, organic matter etc.

Fact 29: About 1.2 billion people or 1 in 3 people in rural areas defecate in the open. Open defecation poses an human health risk and compromises quality in nearby water bodies.

Fact 30: Aquatic animal have faced an estimated extinction rate five times more than that of terrestrial animals.

Fact 31: According to WHO and UNICEF, approximately 894 million people globally don’t have access to improved water sources.

Fact 32: Over 30 billion tons of urban sewage discharged into lakes, rivers and oceans each year.

Fact 33: Leather and chemical industries cause are major contributors of water pollution and are emerging leading market economies.

Fact 34: Two million tons of human waste is disposed in water everyday.

Fact 35: As per reports by UNESCO, 27% of the urban population do not have piped water in their homes.

Fact 36: An estimated 1000 children die every day in India due to polluted water.

Fact 37: Lack of safe drinking water and sanitation in cities leads to cholera, malaria and diarrhoea.

Fact 38: Huge oil spill was caused by BP in the year 2010. Over 1,000 animals i.e. birds, turtles, mammals have been reported dead and many of them were on the endangered species list.

Fact 39: Each year 1.2 trillion gallons of untreated sewage, storm water, and industrial waste are dumped into U.S. waters.

Fact 40: Cruise ships are also a major source of water pollution. They produce over 200,000 gallons of sewage which is mostly released in the ocean. Apart form that, they are also causing at least 35,000 gallons of water contamination due to oil spill.

Even though people have already started taking precautions, the water pollution levels are rising rapidly and there is very little hope left to the polluted water bodies. One big step that every human being can take to prevent water pollution is to minimize water contamination and wastage from their side at every possible level. This was we will be able to save some clean water for the future generations.

References: http://www.nrdc.org/water/

Apr 042016
 

I have recently been made aware of an amazing design from Italy

Some may consider this structure to be a work of art and pleasing to the eye, but it has a hidden agenda. It is the brainchild of Italian artist, architect and industrial designer, Arturo Vittori, and it could be the solution to many of water shortage problems all over the world, if the “Warka Water” teams’ vision is to be realized in the very near future (predicted full production in 2019)

Warka Water 01

A work of art on a mission (the vision)

This work of art is actually designed to extract water from the very air that we breathe, using principals found in nature, as used by plants and creatures to extract water from the air in arid areas of the world

As quoted on their website:- www.warkawater.org

“Warka Water relies only on natural phenomena such us gravity, condensation & evaporation and doesn’t require electrical power. It is a vertical structure designed to harvest potable water from the atmosphere (it collects rain, harvests fog and dew). Warka Water is designed to be owned and operated by the villagers, a key factor that will facilitate the success of the project. The tower not only provides a fundamental resource for life – water – but also creates a social place for the community, where people can gather under the shade of its canopy for education and public meetings”

This is the reason I find this so amazing as it falls completely in-line with whole design philosophy of d-zine hub ECO products

The design

From vision to design

 

The people that are not near to water resources normally have to resort to extreme measures to obtain a regular supply of water

 

The old way crop

Typical very hygienic water sources in Africa

 

Woman carrying water

Who knows how far she has already walked

 

Women carrying water

Who knows how far they still have to walk

 

This very time consuming labor intensive excercise will be alleviated with the introduction Warka Water towers in the areas affected with low rainfall

 

The new way

Shade and water on hand

 

The tower in use in Ethiopia

Shade and water problem solved

 

The Warka Water tower provides a perfect gathering area for water, meetings and even education

Sources:- Warka Water, Wickipedia, mental_floss

Images courtesy:- Warka Water,  Wickimedia

Apr 012016
 

Rindercella header image

The tale of Cinderella becoming Rindercella

A spoonerised passage first heard recited by Loyden Bewis at a few gatherings (raised a chuckle or two I’ll tell you) and also gleaned from many historic sources (clean and dirty) and embelished a little by Wony Tilkinson can be emi-samusing as in:-

In some coreign fountry, there lived a very geautiful birl named Rindercella and a very prandsome hince, called Chince Prarming.

Chince Prarming was going to have a bancy fall at his ceautiful bastle and he’d invited all the people for riles amound, especially the pich reople.

Now Rindercella spent a lot of her time shoing gopping, flubbing scroors, dashing wishes and also booking and caking, she even ran the edd orand or two.

She also had a mugly other with chouble dins , a sin ugly thister with featy sweet and a sat ugly fister with eaty swarmpits.

To primpress the ince, they all went out and bought clancy fothes to wear to the ceautiful bastle, on the bight of the nall.

Rindercella’s jamily were fealous because she was a really geautiful birl, so she wasn’t allowed to go with them and all she had weft to lear were some rirty old dags.

Finally the night of the bancy fall came, the mugly other, the sin ugly thister and the sat ugly fister rode off in a cancy foach drawn by hour forses.

Rindercella couldn’t go, so she just cat down and sried. While she was citting there srying, her gairy fodmother appeared, with a foop!

She waved  her wagic mand and with another foop! Rindercella was instantly dressed in a geautiful bown of ghite and wold, with matching slass glippers!

With a bighty mang! she also purned a tumpkin into a cig barriage and mix white sice into hix white sorses to carry Rindercella to the ball.

 

Rindercella middle image

With a bighty mang! she also purned a tumpkin into cig barriage

 

The gairy fodmother warned Rindercella to be mome by hidnight, or the brell would be spoken.

The dess would drissappear and the cig barriage would purn into a tumpkin and the morses would become hice again.

When Rindercella arrived at the bancy fall, Chince Prarming watched her arrive from a widden hindow and he met her at the door.

The prandsome hince and Rindercella got on wery vell so they nanced all dight, until they lell in fove.

He was just about to quop the pestion as he was stunderthruck with her and she was also gotally tobsmacked.

Suddenly, the mock struck clidnight!

Rindercella raced stown the dairs, but as she got almost all of the way down she slopped her dripper on the stottom bep and didn’t have wime to taste so she han away rome.

The dext nay, Chince Prarming went all over that coreign fountry, searching for the geautiful birl who had slopped her dripper and ven thanished.

He fad to hind her as he was very luch in move and after a song learch, they came to Rindercella’s house.

He tried the slass glipper on the mugly other. It fidn’t dit.

He tried the slass glipper on the sin ugly thister. It fidn’t dit.

He tried the slass glipper on the sat ugly fister. It also fidn’t dit.

Finally, he tried the slass glipper on Rindercella. It was exactly the sight rize. It fid dit.

 

Rindercella final image

It was exactly the sight rize. It fid dit.

 

So Chince Prarming and Rindercella were married and they hived lappily ever after.

 

Now the storal of this mory is:

If you are a geautiful birl and want a prandsome hince to lall in fove with you, then go to a bancy fall and nance the dight away and please don’t forget to slop your dripper on the way home.

Mar 172016
 

Having done a lot of research on this situation I am encouraged to be able to take a more balanced view on the plight of our planets animal resources than my view of the plight of our planet

There are many encouraging signs that the massive drive by organisations like the World Wildlife Fund, International Union for Conservation and Nature and human beings in general are stemming the tide of declining animal population numbers and of possible extinctions

As always human encroachment, loss of habitat, poaching, hunting, deforestation and climate change still are the main contributors to their plight

According to Joshua Hill of Planetsave “Prompt and stringent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally would reduce these biodiversity losses by 60 per cent if global emissions peak in 2016, or by 40 per cent if emissions peak in 2030, showing that early action is very beneficial. This will both reduce the amount of climate change and also slow climate change down, making it easier for species and humans to adapt.”

Dodo_painting_jardin_des_plantes crop

Painting by Jardin des Plantes only a painting will capture an image of a ‘dodo’ as the last recorded sighting was 1665 and is the first recognition of human involvement in the disappearance of a species

The dodo is often used as a symbol of extinction and obsolescence. The first recorded mention was by Dutch sailors in 1598. In the following years, the bird was hunted by sailors, their domesticated animals, and invasive species introduced during that time. The last widely accepted sighting of a dodo was in 1662. The extinction of the dodo within less than a century of its discovery called attention to the previously un-recognised problem of human involvement in the disappearance of an entire species. It is frequently used as a mascot on Mauritius

 

 

IUCA Red List Catagories

Tabulation of categories taken from the IUCA Red List document

Definition: Taxon, plural Taxa, any unit used in the science of biological classification, or taxonomy. Taxa are arranged in a hierarchy from kingdom to subspecies, a given taxonordinarily including several taxa of lower rank.

 

The ‘International Union for Conservation and Nature’ (IUCN) categories, with examples of animals classified by them, include:

Extinct (EX)

A species is extinct when the last existing member dies. Extinction therefore becomes a certainty when there are no surviving individuals that can reproduce and create a new generation

A species may become functionally extinct when only a handful of individuals survive, which cannot reproduce due to poor health, age, sparse distribution over a large range, a lack of individuals of both sexes (in sexually reproducing species), or other reasons

Pinpointing the extinction (or pseudoextinction) of a species requires a clear definition of that species. If it is to be declared extinct, the species in question must be uniquely distinguishable from any ancestor or daughter species, and from any other closely related species. Extinction of a species (or replacement by a daughter species) plays a key role in the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis of Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge

In ecology, extinction is often used informally to refer to local extinction, in which a species ceases to exist in the chosen area of study, but may still exist elsewhere. This phenomenon is also known as extirpation. Local extinctions may be followed by a replacement of the species taken from other locations; wolf reintroduction is an example of this. Species which are not extinct are termed extant. Those that are extant but threatened by extinction are referred to as threatened or endangered species

Examples:  aurochs, Bali tiger, blackfin cisco, Caribbean monk seal, Carolina parakeet, Caspian tiger, dodo, dusky seaside sparrow, eastern cougar, golden toad, great auk, Japanese sea lion, Javan tiger, Labrador duck, passenger pigeon, Schomburgk’s deer, Steller’s sea cow, thylacine, toolache wallaby, western black rhinoceros

You will only find very old photographs

A ‘Caspian tiger’ you will only find, very old photographs like this, of this guy, but wait a minute, he might not have been the last of his kind

The last Caspian tiger Panthera tigris virgata was glimpsed in 1958, in Tigrovaya Balka Nature Reserve in Tajikistan close to the Afghan border where the Vakhsh River and the Panj River join to form the Amu Darya river, although this is a matter of debate, as the legendary final wild Caspian tiger is said to have been killed in February, 1970, in Hakkari Province, Turkey.  Panthera tigris virgata was extinct. Or was it? According to Carlos Driscoll World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Chair in Conservation Genetics at the Wildlife Institute of India. He and his colleagues compared the preserved tigers’ DNA with that of living Amur tigers which is the Siberian tiger Panthera tigris altaica. Caspian and Siberian tigers turned out to be one and the same, “The tigers are too closely related to be a separate subspecies.”  Declaring the Caspian tiger extinct, he says, may have been a bit premature. These findings, however, raise the possibility of repopulating a now tiger-less Central Asia with Siberian tigers, according to Igor Chestin, CEO of WWF-Russia “In the right habitat,” he believes, “the Caspian tiger’s former range is open to the reintroduction of Amur tigers.”

 

Extinct in the wild (EW)

Captive individuals survive, but there is no free-living, natural population

A species is extinct in the wild (EW) when it is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well outside the past range. It is presumed Extinct in the Wild when exhaustive surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal, annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an individual. Surveys should be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon’s life cycle and life form.

Examples: Barbary lion, Hawaiian crow, Père David’s deer, scimitar horned oryx, Socorro dove, Wyoming toad

Could be gone pretty soon

Could be gone pretty soon this ‘scimitar (horned) oryx’. there are Australians at Werribee Open Range Zoo and many other zoo’s and private concerns breeding them in captivity

Scimitar-horned oryx were once widespread in North Africa but the species is now classed as ‘extinct in the wild’ by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (on the IUCN ‘red list’).

There has been a long-term decline in numbers because of climate changes (excessive drought), uncontrolled hunting by people, agricultural encroachment on their habitat, and excessive grazing of limited vegetation by domestic livestock.

There have not been any confirmed sightings of scimitar-horned oryx in the wild for over 20 years, although perhaps as many as 9000 animals survive in zoos, safari parks, ranches and public holdings around the world, along with some small populations reintroduced to Tunisia and Morocco in fenced, protected areas.

Werribee Open Range Zoo is part of an international breeding program to help save this species from extinction.

 

The Pinta Island tortoise (Geochelone nigra abingdoni) had only one living individual, named ‘Lonesome George’, until his death in June 2012. These tortoises were believed to be entirely extinct in the mid-20th century, until Hungarian malacologist József Vágvölgyi spotted Lonesome George on the Galapagos island of Pinta on 1 December 1971. Since then, Lonesome George has been a powerful symbol for conservation efforts in general and for the Galapagos Islands in particular. With his death on 24 June 2012, the subspecies is again believed to be extinct. With the discovery of 17 hybrid Pinta tortoises located at nearby Wolf Volcano a plan has been made to attempt to breed the subspecies back into a pure state. If successful, this would be the first time a species has been recovered from having been declared extinct

'Lonesome George" he was the last

The Pinta Island tortoise ‘Lonesome George’ he was the last of his kind but there may be some hope of a Galapagos comeback

 

Critically endangered (CR)

Faces an extremely high risk of extinction in the immediate future

To be defined as critically endangered in the Red List, a species must meet any of the following criteria (“3G/10Y” signifies three generations or ten years—whichever is longer—over a maximum of 100 years; “MI” signifies Mature Individuals):

Occurring over less than 100 km² and two of:

Severe habitat fragmentation or existing at just one location

Decline in extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, area/extent/quality of habitat, number of locations/sub-populations, or amount of MI

Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, number of locations/sub-populations, or amount of MI

As above, but less than 10 km² (used to show differing levels of severity)

Declining population of less than 250 MI and either:

A decline of 25% over 3 generations or 10 years;

Extreme fluctuations, or over 90% of MI in a single sub-population, or no more than 50 MI in any one sub-population

Numbers less than 50 MI

At least 50% chance of going Extinct in the Wild over 3 generations or 10 years

or when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Critically Endangered (see Section V) in the IUCN Red List categories and criteria , and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.

Examples:  addax, African wild ass, Alabama cavefish, Amur leopard, Arakan forest turtle, Asiatic cheetah, axolotl, Bactrian camel, black rhino, blue-throated macaw, Brazilian merganser, brown spider monkey, California condor, Chinese alligator, Chinese giant salamander, gharial, Hawaiian monk seal, Javan rhino, kakapo, Leadbeater’s possum, Mediterranean monk seal, mountain gorilla, northern hairy-nosed wombat, Philippine eagle, red wolf, saiga, Siamese crocodile, Malayan tiger, Spix’s macaw, southern bluefin tuna, South China tiger, Sumatran orangutan, Sumatran rhinoceros, Sumatran tiger, vaquita, Yangtze river dolphin, northern white rhinoceros, hawksbill sea turtle, Kemp’s ridley sea turtle

Population 880 threats so severe

The ‘mountain gorilla’ population 880 – threats were so severe that it was once thought the species might be extinct by the end of the twentieth century. Despite ongoing civil conflict, poaching and encroaching human population, numbers of mountain gorillas have thankfully increased

 

Threat Effect on Gorilla Population Conservation Efforts
Poaching
  • Gorillas are maimed or killed by traps set for other animals.
  • Abduction of infants for illegal selling to zoos and as pets. This often results in other adult gorillas being killed in the process.
  • Increased patrolling using armed guards in protected forest areas.
  • Karisoke’s guards find and remove some 1,000 snares each year.
  • Gorilla censuses to monitor gorilla population.
  • Karisoke Research Centre runs a facility for young gorillas rescued from poachers.
Habitat loss
  • Rapidly expanding human settlements are removing the gorilla habitat.
  • Fragmentation of forested areas has resulted in the isolation of gorilla groups from each other, reducing genetic diversity.
  • Expansion of areas of national park to protect habitat.
Disease
  • Regular contact of tourists with the gorillas allows transmission of diseases from humans to the gorillas.
  • Domestic animals and livestock also contribute to disease transmission.
  • Requirement to stay at least 7 meters from gorillas at all times.
  • Better management of ecotourism.
  • More education for local communities to minimise impact of livestock.
War and unrest
  • Refugees removing trees to create settlements and farms.
  • Increased use of gorillas for meat by displaced peoples.
  • Gorillas can be killed by land mines placed along forest paths.
Local communities
  • Habitat removal.
  • Lack of support for conservation efforts due to insufficient education and awareness amongst locals.
  • Poverty encourages the use of slash and burn agriculture to grow food.
Karisoke Research centre has:

  • Created Virunga biodiversity inventory and field guides, to support public education and ecotourism.
  • Supplied primary school students with books and other materials.
  • Run conservation programs for secondary schools.
  • Provided biodiversity training for local park staff and conservation groups.
  • Provide field courses and internships for Rwandan college students.

 

Endangered (EN)

Faces a high risk of extinction in the near future

Reduction in population size based on any of the following:

An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥ 70% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following:

An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥ 50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible

Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both

Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 5,000 km², and estimates indicating at least two of A – C

Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 500 km², and estimates indicating at least two of A – C

Population estimated to number fewer than 2,500 mature individuals and either:

An estimated continuing decline of at least 20% within five years or two generations, whichever is longer, (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future) OR

Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals

A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Endangered (see Section V) in the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, and it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild

Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 20% within 20 years or five generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years).

Examples:  African penguin, African wild dog[a], Asian elephant, Asiatic lion, Australasian bittern, blue whale, bonobo, Bornean orangutan, common chimpanzee, dhole, eastern lowland gorilla, hispid hare, giant otter, giant panda, Goliath frog, green sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, Grevy’s zebra, hyacinth macaw, Humblot’s heron, Iberian lynx, Japanese crane, Japanese night heron, Lear’s macaw, Malayan tapir, markhor, Malagasy pond heron, Persian leopard, proboscis monkey, purple-faced langur, pygmy hippopotamus, red-breasted goose, Rothschild’s giraffe, snow leopard, South Andean deer, Sri Lankan elephant, takhi (near Critically Endangered) Toque macaque, Vietnamese pheasant, volcano rabbit, wild water buffalo, white-eared night heron, fishing cat, tasmanian devil

The blue whale is the largest animal ever

The ‘blue whale’ is the largest animal ever known to have existed imagine having 200 tonnes of meat and blubber. Certain to be an attraction to we humans

 

Blue whales are simply enormous with most ranging in length from 24-30 m. The largest ever recorded was a gargantuan 33.5 m long

Females are up to 10 m longer than males and they can weigh up to 200 tonnes

During the 20th century, the species was almost exterminated due to commercial whaling.

The species has slowly recovered following the global whaling ban but it remains endangered and faces a number of serious threats including ship strikes and the impact of climate change

There is one documented case in National Geographic Magazine of a blue whale being attacked by orcas off the Baja California Peninsula; although the orcas were unable to kill the animal outright during their attack, the blue whale sustained serious wounds and probably died as a result of them shortly after the attack. Up to a quarter of the blue whales identified in Baja bear scars from orca attacks

With global warming causing glaciers and permafrost to melt rapidly and allowing a large amount of fresh water to flow into the oceans, there are concerns that if the amount of fresh water in the oceans reaches a critical point, there will be a disruption in the ‘thermohaline’ circulation

The Thermohalene Circulation patterns

The Thermohalene Circulation patterns in our oceans

 

The change in ocean temperature would also affect the blue whale’s food supply. The warming trend and decreased salinity levels would cause a significant shift in krill location and abundance

Blue whales may be wounded, sometimes fatally, after colliding with ocean vessels, as well as becoming trapped or entangled in fishing gear

The ever-increasing amount of ocean noise, including sonar, drowns out the vocalizations produced by whales, which makes it harder for them to communicate and locate their food

Human threats to the potential recovery of blue whale populations also include accumulation of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) chemicals within the whale’s body, PCB’s cause cancer in animals and are probable human carcinogens

 

Vulnerable (VU)

Faces a high risk of endangerment in the medium term

is Vulnerable when it is not Critically Endangered or Endangered but is facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future, as defined by any of the following criteria:

An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected reduction of at least 20% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, based on (and specifying) any of the following:

A reduction of at least 20%, projected or suspected to be met within the next ten years or three generations, whichever is the longer, based on (and specifying) any of the above
Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 20,000 km2 or area of occupancy estimated to be less than 2000 km2, and estimates indicating any two of the following:

Population estimated to number fewer than 10,000 mature individuals and either:

Population very small or restricted in the form of either of the following:

Population estimated to number less than 1000 mature individuals

Population is characterised by an acute restriction in its area of occupancy (typically less than 100 km2) or in the number of locations (typically less than five). Such a taxon would thus be prone to the effects of human activities (or stochastic events whose impact is increased by human activities) within a very short period of time in an unforeseeable future, and is thus capable of becoming

Critically Endangered or even Extinct in a very short period

Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 10% within 100 years.

A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Vulnerable (see Section V) in the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild.

Examples: African grey parrot, African bush elephant, African lion, American paddlefish, common carp, clouded leopard, cheetah[c], dugong, Far Eastern curlew, fossa, Galapagos tortoise, gaur, blue-eyed cockatoo, golden hamster, whale shark, hippopotamus, Humboldt penguin, Indian rhinoceros, Komodo dragon, lesser white-fronted goose, mandrill, maned sloth, mountain zebra, polar bear, red panda, sloth bear, takin, yak, great white shark, American crocodile, dingo, king cobra

An African Elephant sporting fairly small worldwide treasure

An ‘African Elephant’ sporting fairly small examples of a worldwide treasure, they are killed for far smaller tusks

 

An estimated over a 100 African elephants are killed each day by poachers seeking ivory, meat and body parts

In 1980, there were over 1,000,000 African elephants; today, there are less than 400,000

Wildlife hunting is big business a 2013 estimate valued the illegal poaching trade in Africa as being worth $17 billion dollars a year and growing.

Elephants are more like us than you may know. They can be gay, left-handed, have the ability to grieve and – true to reputation – have amazing memories

Of the 157 poaching related cases detected in Kenya during the period 2010-1013, less than five per cent were prosecuted and only three of those convicted were sentenced to jail

The Kenyan government in the meantime has had a complete turnaround and is participating fully in Elephant conservation in a big way

Wildlife hunting is big business, a recent 2013 estimate valued the illegal poaching trade in Africa as being worth $17 billion dollars a year and growing

Animal rights groups estimate that poachers in Africa kill between 25,000 and 35,000 elephants annually

Near-threatened (NT)

May be considered threatened in the near future

A species which has been categorised as “Near Threatened” (NT) as that which may be considered threatened with extinction in the near future, although it does not currently qualify for the threatened status. The IUCN notes the importance of re-evaluating near-threatened taxa at appropriate intervals

The rationale used for near-threatened taxa usually includes the criteria of vulnerable which are plausible or nearly met, such as reduction in numbers or range. Near-threatened species evaluated from 2001 onwards may also be ones which are dependent on conservation efforts to prevent their becoming threatened, whereas prior to this conservation-dependent species were given a separate category (“Conservation Dependent”)

Additionally, the 402 conservation-dependent taxa may also be considered near-threatened

A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future.

Examples:  American bison, Asian golden cat, blue-billed duck, emperor goose, emperor penguin, Eurasian curlew, jaguar, leopard, Larch Mountain salamander, Magellanic penguin, maned wolf, narwhal, margay, montane solitary eagle, Pampas cat, Pallas’s cat, reddish egret, white rhinoceros, striped hyena, tiger shark, white eared pheasant

The species comes close to qualifying as Vulnerable

The ‘Asian golden cat’ species comes close to qualifying as Vulnerable (VU) due to hunting pressure and habitat loss, since Southeast Asian forests are undergoing the world’s fastest regional deforestation

Asian golden cats inhabit some of the fastest developing countries in the world, where they are increasingly threatened by habitat destruction following deforestation, along with a declining natural prey base

It has been reported killed in revenge for depredating livestock, including poultry but also larger animals such as sheep, goats and buffalo calves.

Asian golden cats are poached mainly for their fur and although the Asian golden cat is completely protected under Myanmar’s national legislation.

In Myanmar, 111 body parts from at least 110 individuals were observed in four markets surveyed between 1991 and 2006.

Numbers were significantly greater than those of non-threatened species.

Among the observed skins was a specimen with ocelot-like rosettes — a rare tristis form.

Three of the surveyed markets are situated on international borders with China and Thailand and cater to international buyers,

Effective implementation and enforcement of CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, also known as the Washington Convention)is considered inadequate.

Least concern (LC)

No immediate threat to species’ survival

A species in this group is one which has been categorized as evaluated but not qualified for any other category. As such they do not qualify as threatened, near threatened, or (prior to 2001) conservation dependent

Species cannot be assigned the Least Concern category unless they have had their population status evaluated. That is, adequate information is needed to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status

Since 2001 the category has had the abbreviation “LC”, following the IUCN 2001 Categories & Criteria (version 3.1). However, around 20% of least concern taxa (3261 of 15636) in the IUCN database use the code “LR/lc”, which indicates they have not been re-evaluated since 2000. Prior to 2001 “least concern” was a subcategory of the “Lower Risk” category and assigned the code “LR/lc” or (lc)

A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category.

Examples:  American alligator, American crow, Indian peafowl, olive baboon, bald eagle, brown bear, brown rat, brown-throated sloth, Canada goose, cane toad, common wood pigeon, cougar, common frog, giraffe, grey wolf, house mouse, wolverine, human, palm cockatoo, mallard, meerkat, mute swan, platypus, red-billed quelea, red-tailed hawk, rock pigeon, scarlet macaw, southern elephant seal, milk shark, red howler monkey

The scarlet macaw has suffered

The ‘scarlet macaw’ has suffered from local extinction through habitat destruction and capture for the parrot trade, but locally it remains fairly common

 

DATA DEFICIENT (DD)

A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. A taxon in this category may be well studied, and its biology well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution are lacking. Data Deficient is therefore not a category of threat. Listing of taxa in this category indicates that more information is required and acknowledges the possibility that future research will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive use of whatever data are available. In many cases great care should be exercised in choosing between DD and a threatened status. If the range of a taxon is suspected to be relatively circumscribed, and a considerable period of time has elapsed since the last record of the taxon, threatened status may well be justified.

Examples: Still millions of examples too numerous to think about listing them a small percentage of them here

'Zanj Sun Squirrel' finding pictures of this

‘Zanj Sun Squirrel’ finding pictures of this little chap is probably just about as hard as it is to find data on it

 

NOT EVALUATED (NE)

A taxon is Not Evaluated when it has not yet been evaluated against the criteria.

Examples: Amazon tree boa, black-headed python, brown marmorated stink bug, candiru, Children’s python, Chinese high fin banded shark, clown loach, Durrell’s vontsira, dusky dwarf boa, eastern blue-tongued lizard, emerald tree boa, eyelight fish, fire skink, Florida panther, green anaconda, Hunan softshell turtle, Japanese otter, Johnston’s mangabey, Kuhl’s flying gecko, legless searsid, man-of-war fish, Mexican tetra, milkfish, Moore’s woolly lemur, New Caledonian giant gecko, North Pacific daggertooth, northern brushtail possum, northern stoplight loosejaw, ocean sunfish, Osman Hill’s mangabey, Pacific ground boa, Palawan binturong, pineapplefish, Queensland lungfish, rainbow boa, red-bellied piranha, reticulated python, Scottish wildcat, small-mouth char, southern green stink bug, splitfin flashlightfish, stoplight loosejaw, sugar ant, Tokay gecko, tomato clownfish, Uganda mangabey, Walter’s duiker,

In the past, there were thousands of river otters

In the past, there were thousands of ‘Japanese otters’ in Japan. Now this is the only remaining evidence of them so no one actually had a chance to study them

 

Starting in the Meiji period, the government of Japan adopted a policy of increasing wealth and military prowess. Animal pelts thus became very valuable since they could be exported for money. As a result, Japanese river otters started to be hunted throughout the country. Their numbers soon dwindled. Populations made a slight comeback after the creation of hunting regulations.

Even so, pollution and human development then harmed their environment and resources to build their habitats. This pollution terminated their food sources in the rivers, causing them to hunt in more dangerous settings. These causes grew rapidly, unfortunately resulting in the extinction of the Japanese river otter in the late 20th century.

 

For the complete ‘IUCN Red List categories and criteria’, a PDF file is at your disposal, please observe and adhere to the copyright conditions set out thereinIUCA Red List cover crop

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sources: World Wildlife Fund, International Union for Conservation and Nature, National Geographic, Planetsave, the Independant, Untold Africa, Werribee Open Range Zoo and Wickipedia

Images: Wickimedia

Mar 162016
 

Also to be Patented. Originally designed for South African biltong

It is also perfect for other dried meats like USA beef jerky.

This has gone through being 1st stage prototyped.

Subsequently had a complete design review and final 3D modelling

Has been subjected to tolerance check and motion/clash analysis

It is now ready for manufacture

Mar 162016
 

In the process of being patented (pictures will be displayed after this process is completed)

Special Offer we have 25 units in stock, of our very versatile clothes hanging device the price is normally R1600 + R549 ex. VAT for installation

If you purchase one right now we will install it for free (while stocks last).

An outdoor or indoor clothes line consisting of a reel, wall brackets and line.

10 year guarantee

Advantages

  • The brackets can be attached to opposite or adjacent walls.
  • The reel is located in the most convenient place next to the end of one of the brackets (4 possible positions)
  • The line is fully retractable, giving free access to the area normally taken up by the Adaptaline, allowing the whole area to be fully utilised.
  • Up to 50 metres of retractable wash-line
  • No space restrictions, install it anywhere
  • When needing to use the occupied area, reel in the line and it is completely out of the way
  • Replaces unsightly, cumbersome and potentially dangerous wash-lines
  • Simple to install
  • Once installed, it takes only a few minutes to extend or retract
  • Extend only as much line as required
  • Can also be installed indoors, in the garage/laundry, in the bathroom or on the balcony
  • Brackets need not be exactly opposite each other
  • Can be installed across corners on two adjacent walls
  • Very pliable PVC/PU line
  • Heavy duty zinc electro-plating for use anywhere